I remember attending the ASPB (American Society of Plant Biologists) annual meeting a long time ago when I was a PhD student. A speaker used a bar chart to illustrate the distribution of US research funding across different fields.
Research funding in biology was already significantly less than in other fields, and almost all of that funding went to medical and health related research. Funding for plant science was so minimal that it didn't even appear on that chart. Yes, some say that even without plant science research, plants can grow simply by being planted; without this basic research, they might just not grow well. Why would decision-makers care about this research? When resources are scarce, everyone has to work even harder to compete for limited funding.
Back then, biomass energy was highly valued, so we could still apply for funding from the DOE. However, with more applicants than available funding, lab research funding was still insufficient. Graduate students had to register and prioritize the number of kits they could use to avoid interrupting experiments… Graduate students and their advisors would joke that if they could find a military application for the poplar plant they were researching, then they could apply for research funding from the DOD.
Here, I would like to pay tribute to those who continue to work on basic research even when funding is insufficient. I still love plant research, even though I can't continue it due to reality and practical limitations.
我記得在很久以前我還在唸博士時,去參加 ASPB (American Society of Plant Biologists)年度大會,有一位講者用柱狀圖展示美國科研經費在不同領域的分佈。
I am both a pedestrian and a driver.
I commute to work daily by train and on foot, and the trains are often packed. When I travel to Taipei, New Taipei, Hsinchu, and Kaohsiung for business, I also use public transportation. For me, places within a 20-minute walking distance after getting off the train are suitable for public transportation, but I know many Taiwanese people find even a 10-minute walk too far.
I choose to spend NT$399 per month for unlimited train and bus travel within my commute area, as this is my commuting zone. If I need to commute across counties, I can choose an inter-county monthly pass; if I need to commute by high-speed rail, I can choose a high-speed rail monthly pass. These are the various preferential schemes currently offered by public transportation in Taiwan, and I have witnessed the improvements Taiwan has made year by year.
In the metropolitan areas of the six major cities, whether or not to use public transportation is largely a matter of personal choice, and the enjoyment of using public transportation is even more related to the quality of passengers. How to transfer from one station to another one and from one transportation to another one are not difficult. Train and high-speed rail schedules are clearly listed, and there are App to track bus schedule real-time in major metropolitan areas. If you really want to use a bus, it's easy to find the information. We don't pay the high taxes of welfare states like those in Europe and Australia, so we shouldn't expect government officials to do everything for us. Many things can be easily done by ourselves with a little thought and effort; we should do them ourselves.
Things that require law enforcement are the government's priority. Things that individuals can do themselves shouldn't be constantly asked to be done by the government. Allowing motorcycles, bicycles, and shops to occupy arcades and sidewalks, condoning motorcycles, bicycles turning sidewalks into two-way slow lanes, forcing pedestrians to use both slow and fast lanes, and making it impossible for pedestrians to safely walk from one intersection to the next. I think these are the duties where government law enforcement should be focused on, but is failing to enforce the law. Laws alone are not enough to govern.
我每天 搭火車+走路 上下班,火車上常常塞滿人。去臺北、新北、新竹、高雄出差,也都是搭大眾運輸。對我而言,下車後走路20分鐘左右可達的地方都是適合搭大眾運輸的,但是我知道很多臺灣人連走路10分鐘都嫌遠。
Today (August 23, 2025) is the polling day for Taiwan's referendum on the restart of the Third Nuclear Power Plant. The referendum statement is: "Do you agree to the continued operation of the Third Nuclear Power Plant after the competent authority has confirmed there are no safety concerns?"
I walked to the polling station a little after 11 a.m. on a sweltering hot day to vote. Even though the station was close by, I was still drenched in sweat from the heat. I walked home and retreated back into my air-conditioned room to rest. Since Unit 2 of the Third Nuclear Power Plant was decommissioned on May 17, 2025, Taiwan has been through more than three months of summer without nuclear power, and I can enjoy the air conditioning comfortably at home with no power rationing issues.
This is a referendum that wastes life and money ($1.1 billion). What does "no safety concerns" even mean? It's not defined, so how can anyone confirm it? The plant is located on a fault line, but its earthquake resistance is insufficient. Situated on a tropical coast at the southernmost tip of Taiwan, it could face the possibility of high water temperatures, leaving it without cooling water. The power generated there has to be transmitted all the way to Taipei in the far north, crossing mountains and valleys. Is the power grid resilient enough? What happens if a single link in the chain is compromised? Most importantly, there's nowhere to store all the low, intermediate, and high-level nuclear waste. With so many problems, which competent authority would dare to guarantee "no safety concerns"?
This is a bogus issue, yet a bunch of people who support restarting the plant and didn't graduate from a science or engineering major are criticizing experts and professors for being uneducated. Geologists, drilling experts, electrical engineering professors and experts, and energy conversion and storage experts are all deemed by these people as uneducated, lacking in professional knowledge, and having no scientific literacy. I have a lot of relatives who are just like that.
I still remember one morning before the end of the Spring semester in my freshman year, walking on the lawn in my dorm, thinking about my final report. I gazed at the shimmering dewdrops in the morning light and the most common little yellow flowers. For some reason, I decided to squat down and take a closer look at those inconspicuous blossoms. Suddenly, I was struck and felt "To see a world in a grain of sand, And a heaven in a wild flower"(William Blake).
These were the slogans we shouted when I was studying in the United States in the 1990s, wanting to let the world know the voices of Taiwanese people. We shouted them loudly across North America and around the world.
It was reported that in the 2025 recall, the KMT-governed cities of Taichung and Taipei set up polling stations in unusual locations, including car washes, outdoor tents, funeral homes, private homes, and empty houses. This is really strange. Taipei and Taichung are municipalities directly under the Central Government of Taiwan, and Taipei is the capital of Taiwan. There is not even a normal building for polling stations in the district. How can the polling stations be set up in outdoor tents?
Taiwanese people finally chose the CCP. Cry sadly.
Are people in southern Taiwan the only ones who dislike the CCP? Xinjiang, Tibet, 64, and Hong Kong, these invasions and massacres all happened in front of us, and Taiwanese people chose the same future as them.
2025立委罷免案開票結果一覽 7月26日24案全數不通過 (The results of the 2025 Legislative Yuan recall vote are as follows: All 24 votes failed on July 26, 2025) (https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202507265011.aspx)
Read more!
The southern part of Taiwan was hit hard by typhoon Danas, especially Tainan and Chiayi. After Typhoon Danas left Taiwan on 7/7/2025, several districts and places are still closed for work and classes. Tainan and Chiayi have not yet fully restored power, and Taipower is still working hard to repair them. There are still many damaged houses that need to be repaired, and there are still many branches on the roadside that have not been removed. Farmers and fishermen in Yunlin, Chiayi, and Tainan are suffering greatly; they need to clean up their farmlands and fish ponds. The damage related to solar photovoltaic panels has not been dealt with. There are a lot of things to do.
It seems that the Palace Museum is determined to hold a light and water dance and drone show on 7/12/2025. I don't think this can comfort people. If our homes, crops, fruit trees, and fish ponds are destroyed, how can we still have the mood to watch this performance? I just think it's similar to tell starving poor people "Why not eat meat ball".
After the Palace Museum holds the event tomorrow, the people dislike DDP and Taiwan will definitely say that the DPP government is completely ignorant of the suffering of the people and is still singing and dancing and pretending that everything is fine. It's really disappointing.
Typhoon Danas, which went through the Taiwan Strait and hit Chiayi and Tainan badly, caused heavy damage to Chiayi and Tainan's agriculture. For agricultural damage caused by natural disasters, the government will assess the severity of agricultural damage based on the "Agricultural Disaster Relief Measures" and decide whether to initiate "natural disaster relief". However, the entire assessment process is time-consuming and laborious, requiring a lot of manpower and time to conduct investigations and assessments, which is often not efficient to meet urgent needs. Let's take a look at Taiwan's agricultural insurance: